<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on the Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecm3.org/2009/06/22/update-on-the-model-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecm3.org/2009/06/22/update-on-the-model-2/</link>
	<description>Download and discuss ECM3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Woolson</title>
		<link>http://ecm3.org/2009/06/22/update-on-the-model-2/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Woolson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecm3.org/2009/06/22/update-on-the-model-2/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll suggest that there may be room for a &quot;Community&quot; dimension within the Human category. Community is used in this sense to describe ad hoc, cross-functional groups that bridge people from different departments within an organization&#039;s hierarchical structure, who assemble online to address business goals.

In the emerging realm of &quot;Enterprise 2.0&quot; (E2.0), there is a growing need for community building and community managers. The main lessons of E2.0 have been outlined by Dion Hinchcliffe: 
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=143

The E2.0 marketplace of social media is growing:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=598

The 5 levels for &quot;Community&quot; might be:
1) Unmanaged: No ad hoc, community groups exist within the organization.
2) Incipient: Initial awareness that providing tools to support internal communities might help advance an organization&#039;s business goals. 
3) Formative: Internal communities begin forming with or without official support. 
4) Operational: Internal communities receive official support.
5) Proactive: Community-building tools are used broadly; communities are supported by community managers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll suggest that there may be room for a &#8220;Community&#8221; dimension within the Human category. Community is used in this sense to describe ad hoc, cross-functional groups that bridge people from different departments within an organization&#8217;s hierarchical structure, who assemble online to address business goals.</p>
<p>In the emerging realm of &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; (E2.0), there is a growing need for community building and community managers. The main lessons of E2.0 have been outlined by Dion Hinchcliffe:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=143" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=143</a></p>
<p>The E2.0 marketplace of social media is growing:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=598" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=598</a></p>
<p>The 5 levels for &#8220;Community&#8221; might be:<br />
1) Unmanaged: No ad hoc, community groups exist within the organization.<br />
2) Incipient: Initial awareness that providing tools to support internal communities might help advance an organization&#8217;s business goals.<br />
3) Formative: Internal communities begin forming with or without official support.<br />
4) Operational: Internal communities receive official support.<br />
5) Proactive: Community-building tools are used broadly; communities are supported by community managers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
