Some maturity model text is not overly “executive” friendly, i.e. “Struggling 1.0 implementations of some systems” means nothing and then requires a lookup to find out what this means. This is also an issue, as there is no description of each “block” of the maturity item on pg 12.

This would make the document longer, but the reader in order to measure/plot against the model needs to understand the meaning/definition of the 65 listed blocks.

An expansion of the information contained in the model is essential to reduce ambiguity and simplify use.

Cheers

Chris

Best regards,
Charles DeRosa

Best regards,
Dan

I’m presently working on a final project titled, Digital Content Security: What changes future business employees need to expect? And I’m looking for a magazine publisher to submit my article to and consider publishing it.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Michal Smith

Can you also post the spreadsheet from page 11 in some type of spreadsheet or csv format? Many organizations that would like to use this would have to convert the chart to Excel first.

Thanks a lot,
Charles

Great job with the ECM3 model. One possible little typo in the file name: http://ecmmaturity.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/ec3m-v01_0.pdf

You call it ec3m instead of ecm3. People who save the PDF and search for it later are probably using the keyword ecm or ecm3 instead of ec3m. You’re also mixing dashes and underscores in the file name, I wasn’t sure if that was intentional.

My preferred file name would be something like ECM3_v01.0.pdf.

Once again, great work with the model. We love it!

Best regards,
Charles